Send the madman back?!
What if we sent Saddam back? Do you think he could bring order to that madness?
I promise I'll post more on this later--just wanted to jot it down now. I'm not saying I favor this idea--but it might be crazy enough to work. I know robfurrball (a standing ovation to him--he's being deployed to the Middle East soon) will probably kick my @$$ for this idea...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As promised, more on this one. But first, thanks to charles and queueball for posting comments! (queueball's is actually on this post here)
So here's what I think.
- POINT: Saddam Hussein is a despotic, genocidal, paranoid maniac who ruled his people with fear and an iron fist.
- POINT: Iraq is a mess. Militants are everywhere. Many innocent citizens are killed every day. The Iraqi leadership has no real control over Iraqi rebels--and neither does the US Army.
Derivation of these points: Saddam, while genocidal, did have control of his people--at least his army. If you read some historical info about him (like Wikipedia: Saddam Hussein) you'll notice that one of his major accomplishments during his rise to power was uniting (or, quite possibly, forcibly gluing together) the historically conflicting factions in the area. In addition, during Saddam's ruthless reign, Iraq's infrastructure developed at a fairly rapid clip. In short, Saddam Hussein probably understands the intricacies of managing Iraq better than anyone else--certainly better than any American.
So why not do this--why not bring him back as a consultant? Offer him a good deal--life in exile, rather than submitting himself to a trial that has no chance of being fair--in exchange for aiding us and the new Iraqi government. He wouldn't be given any real power--but we could certainly listen to his observations, and follow those we didn't consider to be too Machiavellian. Who knows? The despot who ran Iraq for 40 years could actually help us run it better, now. The knowledge of a former leader, combined with the somewhat benevolent intentions of a democratic invading army (that wants to get the hell out sometime soon) could just make for a better Iraq.
In reply to charles and queueball's comments:
- Yes, Saddam is being held by the Iraqi goverment. But please don't tell me anyone really believes that when the US says "jump," the Iraqis don't head for the nearest trampoline. If we wanted to offer this sort of a deal, we could certainly incentivize the Iraqis and their ruling party to allow us to do so.
- No, I don't think this is a panacea--it will certainly not allow us to get out tomorrow. But it might make our pullout able to happen a little sooner.
Thanks again for your comments--I'm looking forward to seeing what everyone says!